12 min read

IFS vs Infor M3: An In-Depth ERP Comparison

IFS vs Infor M3: An In-Depth ERP Comparison

Selecting an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system is one of the most crucial technology decisions a company will make. With the global ERP software market expected to exceed $49.5 billion by 2025, finding the right solution is critical. Implementing the right ERP solution can increase efficiency, unify siloed data, and provide the digital foundation for growth. According to recent statistics, 95% of companies see process improvements after ERP implementation. The wrong ERP can set a business back years through disrupted operations, wasted budgets, and low user adoption.

In this in-depth blog post, we will compare two leading ERP platforms - IFS and Infor M3 - across a variety of factors. By evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of each system, businesses can make an informed decision on which solution may be the optimal fit for their needs. With the stakes so high, understanding the key differences between ERP systems like IFS and Infor M3 can set companies up for long-term success.



IFS Overview

Strategic Positioning for Modern Enterprises
IFS is a globally acclaimed ERP software developer with a laser-focused approach tailored to industries that are project-driven. Notable sectors that have seen significant value-addition include aerospace, defense, energy, telecom, manufacturing, and engineering.

Core Competencies:

  • Enterprise Asset Management (EAM): Ensuring optimal performance, reliability, and maintenance of assets, thus driving cost-efficiency and prolonged asset lifecycle.

  • Service Management: Provides an integrated framework for service-focused businesses to efficiently manage end-to-end service processes, optimizing client interactions and service outcomes.

  • Mixed-mode Manufacturing: Catering to the unique demands of different production types, IFS's mixed-mode manufacturing solution helps in balancing and optimizing discrete, process, and repetitive manufacturing.

Global Footprint:
With a substantial clientele base spanning over 10,000 customers globally, IFS prides itself on delivering tangible business outcomes and ensuring continuous innovation in its software suite.

Infor M3 Snapshot

A New Name but Legacy Intact
Infor M3, previously recognized as Lawson M3, continues its legacy of targeting industry giants within manufacturing, food and beverage, chemical, fashion, and distribution niches.

Niche-specific Expertise:

  • Process Manufacturing: Infor M3 stands out for its capability to streamline the intricacies of process manufacturing, from ingredient tracing to compliance.

  • Complex Supply Chain Management: Built with the modern supply chain in mind, Infor M3 addresses challenges like real-time visibility, demand forecasting, and supplier collaboration.

Integration within Infor’s CloudSuite:
A significant aspect of the CloudSuite product portfolio, Infor M3 leverages cloud capabilities, providing clients with scalability, security, and agility. This seamless integration ensures that businesses can drive transformation without operational hiccups.

Global Clientele: Housing a robust client base with more than 10,500 customers, Infor M3's reach stands as a testament to its effectiveness and ability to cater to varying industry demands.


IFS vs M3: Industry Fit

IFS: Tailored for Project-Driven Industries

Niche Focus and Expertise
IFS has carved its space in the ERP landscape by catering predominantly to project-driven sectors. Industries such as aerospace, defense, construction, and engineering are characterized by their expansive, multi-stage projects that span prolonged durations. Here’s how IFS stands out:

  • Complex Project Management: At its core, IFS offers a dynamic solution for businesses to model multifaceted projects. This is not just about Gantt charts and timelines; it delves deeper into the intricacies of large-scale projects, ensuring that every facet is accounted for.

  • Budget Oversight: Maintaining financial discipline is imperative in long-term projects. IFS aids businesses in real-time budget monitoring, ensuring profitability and financial viability.

  • Resource Allocation and Scheduling: To optimize outcomes and timelines, IFS facilitates meticulous resource and schedule monitoring, ensuring that tasks align with the resource pool and time constraints.

Infor M3: Mastering Process Manufacturing

Bridging Formulas with Final Products
Industries engaged in process manufacturing, be it food and beverage, chemicals, or pharmaceuticals, grapple with the dynamic nature of formulas, batch consistency, and quality mandates. Infor M3 comes into play here:

  • Recipe and Formula Management: Adaptability is key. M3’s capabilities ensure that variances in recipes and ingredients are managed efficiently, adapting to changing requirements or ingredient availability.

  • Quality Assurance: In sectors where quality can't be compromised, M3 offers rigorous quality control modules. Whether it's ensuring the efficacy of a pharmaceutical drug or the taste consistency of a beverage, M3 ensures adherence to the highest quality standards.

  • Batch Production: Catering to the demands of batch production, M3 optimizes the production cycles based on the attributes of the final product, ensuring efficiency and consistency.

Discrete Manufacturing: IFS vs. Infor M3

When navigating the realm of discrete manufacturing, both IFS and Infor M3 emerge as formidable contenders:

  • Modular Shop Floor Control: Both systems offer granular control over shop floor operations, ensuring that manufacturing processes are streamlined and disruptions minimized.

  • Quality Management: Commitment to quality is paramount in discrete manufacturing. Both ERP solutions equip businesses with tools to maintain product standards and ensure compliance.

  • Inventory Planning: Balancing demand with supply is an ongoing challenge. IFS and Infor M3 equip enterprises with inventory forecasting and optimization tools, ensuring that stock levels align with market demands.

Key Takeaway: Whether you're juggling massive projects or perfecting a product recipe, IFS excels in detailed project oversight, while Infor M3 is your go-to for consistent manufacturing quality. For classic product-making, it's a toss-up – both tools offer top-notch support to keep things running smoothly. Choose based on your industry's core needs.



IFS vs M3: Core Functionality

IFS: Mastering the Full Project Lifecycle

Mastering the Project Lifecycle
At the heart of IFS's ERP solution is a sophisticated project management module that is both comprehensive and intuitive. Here’s a deeper dive:

IFS Project cycle

  • Holistic Project Modeling: IFS allows businesses to create intricate, multi-stage project models. This feature isn't merely about creating a blueprint; it's about mirroring the real-world complexities of the project within the system.

  • Centralized Project Hub: By centralizing all project-related facets - be it budgets, schedules, resources, or timelines - IFS ensures that stakeholders have a single source of truth, thereby enhancing decision-making.

  • Long-term Project Mastery: For enterprises that embark on projects spanning months to years, the agility and depth of IFS’s project management functionality ensure that even the longest and most complex projects remain on track and transparent.

Infor M3: Mastering Manufacturing and Supply Chain Excellence

Bridging Ingredients to Inventory
Infor M3 brings to the table unparalleled strengths in manufacturing, underpinned by a sophisticated supply chain suite. A closer look reveals:

  • Dynamic Recipe Management: The ability to flexibly manage recipes, especially with variations due to ingredient attributes and batches, ensures that process manufacturing remains adaptive. Whether it's a change in the origin of an ingredient or a slight variation in its quality, M3 seamlessly adjusts recipes.

  • Multi-dimensional Inventory Management: Inventory isn’t just about quantity. With M3, businesses can monitor inventory across multiple dimensions - location, batch, quality, and more. This granularity ensures optimal stock levels and swift response to changes in demand or supply.

  • Demand-driven Supply Chain: In an era where customer demands can be volatile, M3’s forecasting and production planning modules empower enterprises to create a supply chain that responds to real-world demand patterns. This not only reduces wastage but also ensures timely fulfillment.

Key Takeaway: IFS excels in comprehensive project management, offering a centralized system for intricate, long-term projects. Infor M3 dominates in manufacturing and supply chain, with adaptive recipe management and precise inventory control. Decide based on your core operational needs.

IFS Pricing Calc CTA 2024 banner


IFS vs M3: Customization and Flexibility

IFS: Embracing Service-Oriented Architecture for Seamless Customization

Customization without Compromising Core Integrity
One of the most significant strengths of IFS is its architecture, which is grounded in a Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) approach. This offers a slew of benefits:

  • Non-invasive Customizations: By enabling businesses to implement modifications without delving into the core codebase, IFS ensures that these customizations remain independent. This approach minimizes disruptions during system upgrades and keeps the essential system components untouched, thus preserving stability and reliability.

  • Upgrade Simplicity: Future upgrades, an inevitable aspect of ERP solutions, become considerably less cumbersome. As customizations are layered atop the core without altering it, system updates can seamlessly integrate without negating or conflicting with the custom features.

Infor M3: Configuration Mastery with Variant Configurator

Harnessing the Power of Out-of-the-box Configuration
While Infor M3’s approach differs slightly, its strength lies in the breadth of configuration options it provides. The Variant Configurator tool stands out in this regard:

  • Tailored Configurations: With the Variant Configurator, M3 offers a broad spectrum of configuration choices. Whether it's adapting to specific industry nuances or catering to unique organizational demands, M3 provides tools that can be precisely tailored.

  • Balancing Flexibility with Complexity: While the vastness of configuration options provides businesses the flexibility to mirror their processes closely, it also brings forth a nuanced challenge. The implementation phase for M3 tends to be intricate due to the plethora of choices. Thus, proper planning, clear business process mapping, and expert guidance during the setup phase can ensure that the system aligns perfectly with the organization's needs.

Key Takeaway: IFS allows for customization without meddling with the core, ensuring easy upgrades in the future. Infor M3, on the other hand, offers extensive configuration options but requires a more intricate implementation process. Your decision hinges on balancing immediate customization needs with long-term system evolution and maintenance.


IFS vs M3: Integration & Deployment Options

IFS: Seamless Integration with Modern Tools

Adaptive API Framework
IFS recognizes the importance of seamless integration in today’s interconnected business ecosystem. Its modern API architecture ensures that:

  • Flexible Connectivity: Whether it's connecting to CRM systems, third-party logistics tools, or sophisticated Business Intelligence platforms, IFS's adaptive APIs ensure smooth data flow and interoperability.

  • Consistent Upgrades: As businesses evolve and adopt newer platforms or tools, IFS’s modern API structure ensures that integration remains seamless even as other systems undergo upgrades or changes.

Infor M3: Holistic Integration Capabilities

Built for the Modern Enterprise
Infor M3, designed with the contemporary enterprise in mind, embraces a holistic integration strategy:

  • Versatile ERP Integration Tools: Beyond just APIs, M3 provides a suite of integration tools, ensuring that businesses can choose the most efficient path to integrate third-party platforms, be it through standard connectors, middleware, or custom integrations.

  • Real-time Data Flow: Recognizing the importance of real-time data in decision-making, M3's integration capabilities ensure that data exchange between systems is timely, reducing latency and enhancing operational responsiveness.

Common Ground: Deployment Flexibility & Implementation Timeframes

Deployment Choices to Suit Business Needs
Both IFS and Infor M3 provide organizations with the flexibility of choosing their deployment mode:

  • On-Premise: For organizations that have invested in local infrastructure or have specific data residency requirements, both systems can be implemented on-premise, ensuring full control over data and system management.

  • Cloud-Based: Embracing the cloud-first approach, both IFS and Infor M3 offer cloud deployment options. This ensures scalability, reduced IT overhead, and enhanced system availability.

Implementation Dynamics
With certified partners at the helm of implementation:

  • Time-Optimized Rollout: Both IFS and Infor M3 can be rolled out in similar timeframes, ensuring businesses can transition with minimal operational disruption.

  • Expertise-Driven Approach: Leveraging the expertise of certified partners ensures that implementation is not just about system setup, but also about aligning the ERP platform with the organization's strategic and operational nuances.

Key Takeaway: IFS and Infor M3 both excel in integration with other systems and offer versatile deployment options. Your choice should consider not only the ERP's intrinsic features but also its ability to harmoniously fit within your existing tech stack and desired deployment method.


IFS vs M3: Training & Support

IFS: Leading with IFS Academy

Education and Skill Enhancement
IFS takes a front-footed approach to user education and support, with IFS Academy being its crowning jewel:

  • Extensive Learning Resources: With an assortment of tutorials, courses, webinars, and more, IFS Academy ensures users can always find pertinent learning resources to upskill or solve specific challenges.

  • Up-to-Date Documentation: Keeping documentation current is paramount in ensuring users are always working with the latest and most accurate information. IFS's commitment to regularly updating its help documentation means users can trust the guidance they receive.

  • Tailored Training Programs: Recognizing that every organization has unique needs, IFS offers tailored training and onboarding programs, ensuring that teams not only understand the system but also can leverage it in alignment with their specific operational nuances.

Infor M3: Comprehensive Support Framework

Facilitating Seamless Onboarding and Continued Support
While Infor M3 might have certain challenges with its documentation, its commitment to support is unwavering:

  • Client-centric Training: Understanding the importance of smooth transitions, Infor M3 offers training programs crafted specifically for new clients. This means organizations can expect training content that aligns with their industry, operational model, and specific M3 configuration.

  • Ongoing Support Mechanisms: Beyond initial onboarding, Infor M3 provides continuous support to clients, ensuring that they can navigate challenges, system updates, or operational shifts with ease.

Key Takeaway: IFS shines with its educational platform, IFS Academy, offering extensive and up-to-date resources. Infor M3, on the other hand, emphasizes tailored support for new clients and maintains a robust ongoing support mechanism. Your decision should hinge on whether top-tier educational resources or tailored ongoing support aligns more with your organization's needs.


IFS vs M3: User Experience

IFS: A Paradigm of Data Density and Role-based Interface

IFS user interface


Balancing Information and Accessibility
IFS's design philosophy pivots on presenting rich information without compromising accessibility:

  • High Data Density Displays: For power users, who desire comprehensive insights at a glance, IFS's screens can be a treasure trove of data. These users often need the depth of information to make informed decisions, and IFS ensures they have it at their fingertips.

  • Role-based Interfaces: Recognizing that not all users need the same level of data density, IFS smartly introduces role-based interfaces. These interfaces, optimized for tasks like time reporting or expense management, are tailored to the unique demands of the role, ensuring that users aren't overwhelmed and can execute tasks with efficiency.

  • Advanced Mobile Experience: In a world that's rapidly moving towards mobile-first approaches, IFS's evolved mobile experience stands out. Users can access crucial information on the go, ensuring continuity of operations and decision-making regardless of their location.

Infor M3: Championing Simplicity with Multi-Screen Modularity

Astra Canyon Web assets (6)

Elegance in Segmentation
Infor M3 leans into a design philosophy that emphasizes clarity through segmentation:

  • Multi-Screen Approach: By breaking down data sets and presenting them across multiple screens, M3 ensures that users are never overwhelmed with information. This approach is especially beneficial for casual users, who might find dense data displays intimidating.

  • Focused Data Presentation: Each screen in M3's interface is tailored to present specific data sets,  ensuring users can quickly comprehend and act on the
    information without unnecessary distractions.

Key Takeaway: IFS offers a dense data view tailored for power users and ensures adaptability with role-based interfaces, while also offering a robust mobile experience. In contrast, Infor M3 champions straightforwardness with segmented displays suitable for casual users. The decision hinges on understanding your predominant user type and their interface preference.


IFS vs M3: Scalability and Security

IFS: Scalability in Sync with Global Operations

Proactive Scaling for Evolving Enterprises
As organizations grow and morph, IFS provides the robustness to scale alongside:

  • Dynamic Multi-Layered Architecture: IFS's architecture is meticulously designed to ensure that as businesses expand across regions or verticals, the ERP system can grow with them. This design allows for easy addition of servers and computational resources, minimizing growing pains.

  • Global Reach, Local Sensibilities: With its ability to support vast, global enterprise implementations, IFS ensures that while the reach is worldwide, the implementations can be localized to adhere to regional requirements or practices.

Infor M3: Built for Growth without Bounds

Harnessing Enterprise Potential through Scalability
Infor M3 caters to enterprises that have ambitions of scale:

  • Modular Expansion Capabilities: M3's architecture is crafted with scale in mind. The modular design means that as the user base grows or as new locations come online, additional resources can be integrated seamlessly.

  • Efficient Resource Allocation: Beyond just adding servers, M3 ensures that resources are allocated judiciously, ensuring optimal system performance even as the demands grow.

Security: A Shared Commitment

Unyielding Safeguards for Enterprise Integrity
For both IFS and Infor M3, security is non-negotiable:

  • Role-Based Access Control (RBAC): Both systems employ RBAC, ensuring that users access only the data and functionalities pertinent to their roles. This minimizes risks associated with unintentional data leaks or unauthorized data manipulations.

  • Data Encryption: Both IFS and Infor M3 understand the sanctity of enterprise data. Employing stringent encryption mechanisms, both systems ensure that data – whether at rest or in transit – is shielded from malicious actors.

  • Seamless Integration with Identity Management Tools: Recognizing that many enterprises employ specialized identity management solutions, both ERP systems ensure easy integrations. This ensures that user identity and access management remain centralized and consistent across enterprise systems.

Key Takeaway: Scalability is paramount for evolving enterprises, and both IFS and Infor M3 stand ready with dynamic architectures to support expansive growth. Equally critical is security; with both systems offering robust data protection measures and role-based controls. Organizations must evaluate the specific scalability and security nuances of each solution in the context of their growth plans and operational landscape.


IFS vs M3: ERP Cost Considerations

IFS: Transparent and Modular Costing

Understanding the IFS Pricing Philosophy
IFS offers a dynamic pricing model that can cater to the diverse needs of modern enterprises:

  • Module-Based Pricing: IFS's module-based pricing offers organizations the flexibility to only invest in functionalities they truly need. This ensures that businesses aren't saddled with costs for features they might never use.

  • Scalable Cloud Subscription: For those opting for the cloud-based deployment, IFS offers a transparent subscription model. Based on usage metrics such as the number of users, organizations can expect predictability in costs, making budgeting simpler.

Infor M3: Clarity and Flexibility in Licensing

Deciphering the Infor M3 Cost Model
Infor M3's approach to pricing encapsulates the essence of a flexible enterprise solution:

  • Pricing Per Module: In line with IFS, Infor M3 offers a module-based pricing strategy. This empowers businesses to choose and pay for only the functionalities they intend to deploy, ensuring efficient cost management.

  • User-Centric Subscription for Cloud: With the cloud-first approach gaining traction, Infor M3's cloud deployment pricing scales with the number of users. This offers both scalability and clarity in pricing for organizations, irrespective of their size.

Beyond Licensing: A Look at Ancillary Costs

The Fuller Picture of ERP Costing
The licensing or subscription costs are but one component of the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for ERP systems:

  • Implementation Costs: Both IFS and Infor M3 demand lengthy implementations, which will entail substantial costs. Whether it's the manpower involved, third-party integrations, or system configurations, these costs are integral to the setup phase.

  • Change Management: Transitioning to a new or upgraded ERP system often demands significant change management endeavors. From training sessions, workshops, to continuous user support, these activities can bear associated costs.

  • Customizations: While both platforms offer extensive customization capabilities, developing these tailored functionalities can incur costs. Whether it's tweaking existing modules or building new ones from scratch, custom developments can impact the final budget.

  • Maintenance and Upgrades: Beyond initial setup, periodic maintenance and system upgrades are inevitable. While some of these might be covered under licensing or subscription agreements, others might come with separate price tags.

Key Takeaway: The cost of an ERP system transcends its immediate price tag. While both IFS and Infor M3 have clear, flexible pricing strategies, organizations must dive deeper into the comprehensive cost structure, including implementation, training, customizations, and ongoing maintenance. Making an informed ERP investment requires a holistic view of the total cost of ownership, mapped against the anticipated returns in terms of efficiency, scalability, and strategic advantage.

IFS Pricing Calc CTA 2024 banner


Which ERP is Better IFS or M3?

In the competitive world of ERP solutions, both IFS and Infor M3 excel in delivering powerful solutions that cater to the unique demands of various industries. Whether your focus is on project-centric domains or process manufacturing landscapes, these platforms rise above expectations, providing exceptional, global solutions for complex business processes. When it comes to the general discrete manufacturing sector, the capabilities of both systems are closely matched, presenting an even more nuanced decision-making process.

However, it's important to keep in mind that a one-size-fits-all approach is rarely effective in the dynamic world of ERP solutions. Every business has its own unique set of challenges, goals, and operational nuances. This is why it is crucial to engage with unbiased ERP professionals who can help understand the intricacies of your organization's needs. Their expertise will ensure that you are not simply choosing an ERP system, but rather selecting the right partner for your growth journey.

In the final analysis, while both platforms are highly recommended, IFS has a slight advantage, particularly due to its adaptive capabilities and alignment with modern business demands. It is therefore essential for organizations to explore a personalized IFS demo. This hands-on experience will provide insight into how IFS can be customized to address specific business challenges, resulting in an ERP solution that feels tailor-made for your needs.

We encourage you to get in touch with Astra Canyon Group and delve deep into what IFS has to offer. By doing so, you can ensure that your digital transformation is not just about technology, but also about realizing a strategic vision with the right partner.

Get started with IFS ERP

Cybersecurity in the Defense Industry: Choosing the Right ERP and Meeting Defense Reporting and FedRAMP Requirements

Cybersecurity in the Defense Industry: Choosing the Right ERP and Meeting Defense Reporting and FedRAMP Requirements

The defense industry is a vital sector that plays a crucial role in protecting our nation's security. With the increasing prevalence of cyber...

Read More
IFS vs Infor ERP (CloudSuite): Which ERP is Best?

IFS vs Infor ERP (CloudSuite): Which ERP is Best?

The enterprise resource planning (ERP) software market is experiencing rapid growth, expected to reach $71.2 billion by 2025 according to recent...

Read More
Exploring the Power of IFS ERP: A Comprehensive Guide to IFS ERP Modules

Exploring the Power of IFS ERP: A Comprehensive Guide to IFS ERP Modules

If you're exploring the capabilities of IFS Cloud ERP to ensure it aligns with your unique business requirements, you're in the right place. This...

Read More